So the young pessimist has turned into an old optimist,
which I should think is rather unusual. Normally we start out as optimists,
until life experience gradually transforms us into pessimists. And normally it
is the optimists who strike us as naïve. “Naïve pessimism” seems almost a
contradiction in terms. But I guess we can just as easily be naïve pessimists as
we can be naïve optimists if our respective attitudes are rooted in prejudice
and are expressive of our fears or hopes rather than an accurate assessment of probabilities
based on a clear understanding of the facts. Yet if Wells’s early pessimism
appears naïve to the old Wells, would not the old Wells’s optimism have appeared
equally naïve to the young Wells? Not always do we become wiser when we get
older, although we may always think we do. Is it really more informed, more
astute and showing a firmer grasp of reality, to believe that eventually we “will
be able to do anything and go anywhere”? That a completely limitless existence
lies ahead of us? That even if this is all going to happen not now, but at some
time in the future, science will find a way to help us survive until then, to “escape”
from the present in which all those wonderful things that we will be able to do
in the future are not possible yet? Life extension as the new time machine, an
elevator to the future? Of course, before we really get there we won’t know who
is more naïve: those who tend to believe that the scientific and technological
advancement of humanity will eventually lead to a paradise on earth, or those
who worry that it might end in some catastrophe or another.
But be that as it may, it appears that at the very end of
his life Wells, now in his late seventies, went full circle when he once again
changed his mind about the future prospects of humanity and became more
pessimistic even than “that needy and cheerful namesake of his, who lived back
along the time dimension, six and thirty years ago”, and whom he remembers,
slightly embarrassed, but also with a certain fondness, in the 1931 preface to
the new edition of The Time Machine.
On the eve of his departure from this world, it seems to him that instead of
evolving any further, it might be, all things considered, much better if
humanity simply ceased to exist.
Towards the end of his life Wells experienced the devastation of the second world war. So maybe not wonder his change of heart about the prospects of humankind.
ReplyDeleteI think that if now there was to be another world war I would also have a change of heart and turn into a pessimist about the future of humankind.
Michael, have you read Frankenstein? I'd like to hear your take on it.
Yes, I have read Frankenstein. Funny that you should ask about that because as it happens I've just written an article on Frankenstein. It is called, somewhat facetiously, "Wanna live forever? Don't Pull a Frankenstein", and you can access it on my academia.edu site: http://www.academia.edu/2464530/Wanna_Live_Forever_Dont_Pull_a_Frankenstein
DeleteGreat, thanks!
Delete